What is the benefit of using ONLY OpenID authentication on a site? -
from experience openid, see number of significant downsides:
adds single point of failure site
not failure can fixed site if detected. if openid provider down 3 days, recourse site have allow users login , access information own?
takes user sites content , every time logon site
if openid provider not have error, user re-directed site login. login page has content , links. there chance user drawn away site go down internet rabbit hole.
why want send users company's website?
[ note: provider no longer , seems have fixed problem (for now).]
adds non-trivial amount of time signup
sign site new user forced read new standard, chose provider, , signup. standards technical people should agree in order make user experience frictionless. not should thrust on users.
it phisher's dream
openid incredibly insecure , stealing person's id log in trivially easy. [ taken david arno's answer below ]
for of downside, 1 upside allow users have fewer logins on internet. if site has opt-in openid users want feature can use it.
what understand is:
benefit site making openid mandatory?
the list of downsides misses obvious one: phisher's dream. openid incredibly insecure , stealing person's id log in trivially easy.
matt sheppard hits nail on head answer though:the benefit of using openid involves less hassle site creator there no usernames , passwords handle , no user account creation code required.
Comments
Post a Comment