What is the benefit of using ONLY OpenID authentication on a site? -


from experience openid, see number of significant downsides:

adds single point of failure site
not failure can fixed site if detected. if openid provider down 3 days, recourse site have allow users login , access information own?

takes user sites content , every time logon site
if openid provider not have error, user re-directed site login. login page has content , links. there chance user drawn away site go down internet rabbit hole.

why want send users company's website?
[ note: provider no longer , seems have fixed problem (for now).]

adds non-trivial amount of time signup
sign site new user forced read new standard, chose provider, , signup. standards technical people should agree in order make user experience frictionless. not should thrust on users.

it phisher's dream
openid incredibly insecure , stealing person's id log in trivially easy. [ taken david arno's answer below ]


for of downside, 1 upside allow users have fewer logins on internet. if site has opt-in openid users want feature can use it.

what understand is:
benefit site making openid mandatory?

the list of downsides misses obvious one: phisher's dream. openid incredibly insecure , stealing person's id log in trivially easy.

matt sheppard hits nail on head answer though:the benefit of using openid involves less hassle site creator there no usernames , passwords handle , no user account creation code required.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c++ - How do I get a multi line tooltip in MFC -

asp.net - In javascript how to find the height and width -

c# - DataTable to EnumerableRowCollection -